33. Self-perceived health
B) Health status
33. Self-perceived health
- Healthy ageing, ageing population
- Health inequalities (including accessibility of care)
- (Preventable) Burden of Disease (BoD)
- Mental health
- (Planning of) health care resources
Proportion of persons who assess their health to be (very) good.
Proportion of persons who assess their health to be very good or good, based on EU-SILC
question on self-perceived health (‘How is your health in general?’), which contains five
answering categories; 1) very good, 2) good, 3) fair, 4) bad, 5) very bad. Numbers of people
assessing their health as either very good or good should be added and divided by the total
number of people who were interviewed. Age-standardization: see remarks.
Relevant
dimensions
and subgroups
- Calendar year
- Country
- Sex
- Age group (16-64, 65+)
- Socio-economic status (educational level. ISCED 3 aggregated groups: 0-2; 3+4; 5+6; see
remarks).
Preferred
data type and
data source
Preferred data type:
- Health Interview Survey (HIS)
Preferred source:
- Eurostat (EU-SILC. In future possibly EHIS (see remarks)).
For 2004, data are available from EU-SILC for twelve of the EU-15 Member States (no data
for Germany, the UK and the Netherlands) as well as for Norway and Iceland. From 2005
onwards the data are available for all EU-25 Member States and for Iceland and Norway.
Bulgaria and Turkey launched the SILC in 2006. Romania and Switzerland did it in 2007.
Nevertheless, due to quality issues results from Turkey have not been yet disseminated.
Results are available by sex, age group and educational level (ISCED).
EU-SILC is carried out annually. Eurostat requests countries to provide the data within one
year after data collection.
Subjective health measurement is contributing to the evaluation of health problems, the
burden of diseases and health needs at the population level. Perceived health status is not a
substitute for more objective indicators but rather complements these measures. Studies have
shown perceived health to be a good predictor of subsequent mortality.
- Self-perceived general health (based on EU-SILC data) is one of the indicators of the health
and long term care strand developed under the Open Method of Coordination (OMC).
- Eurostat currently does not age-standardize EU-SILC data. For comparability reasons
ECHIM would prefer age-standardized data, however.
- Experts in health inequalities advice using four aggregated ISCED levels rather than three
(see documentation sheet for indicator 6. Population by education). However, as all major
international databases (Eurostat, WHO-HFA, OECD) currently apply an aggregation into 3
groups, for pragmatic reasons ECHIM follows that common methodology for now.
- The EU-SILC question on self-perceived health is part of the Minimum European Health
Module (MEHM), which is also included in the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS).
Once EHIS is fully implemented the quality of the data on self-perceived health derived from
EHIS should be assessed and compared to the quality of the data derived from EU-SILC. If
the former is better, ECHIM may consider appointing EHIS as preferred source for this
indicator. A disadvantage of EHIS is that EHIS will only be carried out once every five years,
while EU-SILC is carried out annually.
- Eurostat metadata: “The implementation of the health questions in SILC is not yet fully
harmonized and, thus, the comparability of the results is to be further improved for some