1
The Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024
Table of Contents
Part 1: Tax Relief for Working Families ................................................................................................... 2
Part 2: American Innovation and Growth .................................................................................................. 2
Part 3: Increasing Global Competitiveness ................................................................................................ 3
Part 4: Assistance for Disaster-Impacted Communities ............................................................................ 7
Part 5: More Affordable Housing .............................................................................................................. 8
Part 6: Tax Administration and Eliminating Fraud ................................................................................... 8
2
Part 1: Tax Relief for Working Families
Calculation of Refundable Credit on a Per-Child Basis. Under current law, the maximum
refundable child tax credit for a taxpayer is computed by multiplying that taxpayer’s earned
income (in excess of $2,500) by 15 percent. This provision modifies the calculation of the
maximum refundable credit amount by providing that taxpayers first multiply their earned
income (in excess of $2,500) by 15 percent, and then multiply that amount by the number of
qualifying children. This policy would be effective for tax years 2023, 2024, and 2025.
Modification in Overall Limit on Refundable Child Tax Credit. Under current law, the
maximum refundable child tax credit is limited to $1,600 per child for 2023, even if the earned
income limitation described above is in excess of this amount. This provision increases the
maximum refundable amount per child to $1,800 in tax year 2023, $1,900 in tax year 2024, and
$2,000 in tax year 2025, along with the inflation adjustment described below.
Adjustment of Child Tax Credit for Inflation. This provision would adjust the $2,000 value
of the child tax credit for inflation in tax years 2024 and 2025, rounded down to the nearest $100.
Rule for Determination of Earned Income. For tax years 2024 and 2025, taxpayers may, at
their election, use their earned income from the prior taxable year in calculating their maximum
child tax credit if the taxpayer’s earned income in the current taxable year was less than the
taxpayer’s earned income in the prior taxable year.
Part 2: American Innovation and Growth
Deduction for Research and Experimental Expenditures. Current law provides that
research or experimental costs paid or incurred in tax years beginning after December 31, 2021,
are required to be deducted over a five-year period. Research or experimental costs that are
attributable to research that is conducted outside of the United States are required to be deducted
over a 15-year period.
The provision delays the date when taxpayers must begin deducting their domestic research or
experimental costs over a five-year period until taxable years beginning after December 31,
2025. Therefore, taxpayers may deduct currently domestic research or experimental costs that are
paid or incurred in tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, and before January 1, 2026.
Extension of Allowance for Depreciation, Amortization, or Depletion in Determining the
Limitation on Business Interest. For tax years beginning before January 1, 2022, the
computation of adjusted taxable income (ATI) for purposes of the limitation on the deduction for
business interest is determined without regard to any deduction allowable for depreciation,
amortization, or depletion (i.e., earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization
(EBITDA)).
The provision extends the application of EBITDA to taxable years beginning after December 31,
2023 (and, if elected, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021), and before January
3
1, 2026. Therefore, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021, and before January 1,
2024, ATI is computed with regard to deductions allowable for depreciation, amortization, or
depletion (i.e., earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT)). However, ATI may be computed as
EBITDA, if elected, for such taxable years. For taxable years beginning after December 31,
2023, and before January 1, 2026, ATI is computed as EBITDA. For taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2025, ATI is computed as EBIT.
Extension of 100 Percent Bonus Depreciation. Qualified property acquired and placed in
service after September 27, 2017, and before January 1, 2023 (January 1, 2024, for longer
production period property and certain aircraft), as well as specified plants planted or grafted
after September 27, 2017, and before January 1, 2023, are eligible for 100-percent bonus
depreciation. The 100-percent allowance is phased down by 20 percent per calendar year for
qualified property acquired after September 27, 2017, and placed in service after December 31,
2022 (after December 31, 2023, for longer production period property and certain aircraft), as
well as for specified plants planted or grafted after December 31, 2022.
The provision extends 100-percent bonus depreciation for qualified property placed in service
after December 31, 2022, and before January 1, 2026 (January 1, 2027, for longer production
period property and certain aircraft) and for specified plants planted or grafted after December
31, 2022, and before January 1, 2026. The provision retains 20-percent bonus depreciation for
property placed in service after December 31, 2025, and before January 1, 2027 (after December
31, 2026, and before January 1, 2028, for longer production period property and certain aircraft),
as well as for specified plants planted or grafted after December 31, 2025, and before January 1,
2027.
Increase in Limitations on Expensing of Depreciable Business Assets. Under Internal
Revenue Code (“IRC”) section 179, a taxpayer may elect to expense the cost of qualifying
property, rather than to recover such costs through tax depreciation deductions, subject to
limitation. Under current law, the maximum amount a taxpayer may expense is $1 million of the
cost of qualifying property placed in service for the taxable year. The $1 million amount is
reduced by the amount by which the cost of such property placed in service during the taxable
year exceeds $2.5 million. The $1 million and $2.5 million amounts are adjusted for inflation for
taxable years beginning after 2018, and were $1.16 million and $2.89 million in 2023,
respectively. In general, qualifying property is defined as depreciable tangible personal property,
off-the shelf computer software, and qualified real property that is purchased for use in the active
conduct of a trade or business.
The provision increases the maximum amount a taxpayer may expense to $1.29 million, reduced
by the amount by which the cost of qualifying property exceeds $3.22 million. The $1.29 million
and $3.22 million amounts are adjusted for inflation for taxable years beginning after 2024. The
proposal applies to property placed in service in taxable years beginning after December 31,
2023.
Part 3: Increasing Global Competitiveness
Subtitle A United States-Taiwan Expedited Double-Tax Relief Act
4
This subtitle provides targeted and expedited relief from double taxation on U.S.-Taiwan cross
border investment through changes to the U.S. tax code.
Short Title. This section provides the short title for subtitle A (the “United States-Taiwan
Expedited Double-Tax Relief Act”).
Special Rules for Taxation of Certain Residents of Taiwan. This section creates new
section 894A of the IRC, providing substantial benefits to Taiwan residents (“qualified residents
of Taiwan”), similar to those that are provided in the 2016 United States Model Income Tax
Convention (“U.S. Model Tax Treaty”). The provisions fall into four primary categories:
1. Reduction of withholding taxes;
2. Application of permanent establishment (“PE”) rules;
3. Treatment of income from employment; and
4. Determination of qualified residents of Taiwan, including rules for dual residents.
Since the application of these provisions requires full reciprocal benefits, the new tax code
section does not come into effect until Taiwan provides the same set of benefits to U.S. persons
with income subject to tax in Taiwan, similar to the reciprocal operation of a tax treaty.
Reduction of withholding taxes
A reduced rate of withholding tax would apply to certain income from U.S. sources received by
qualified residents of Taiwan, such as interest, dividends, royalties, and certain other comparable
payments, such as dividend equivalent amounts.
Instead of the 30 percent withholding tax presently imposed on U.S. source income received by
nonresident aliens and foreign corporations, interest and royalties would be subject to a 10
percent withholding tax rate. Generally, dividends would be subject to a 15 percent withholding
tax rate. Dividends would be subject to a lower 10 percent rate if paid to a recipient that owns at
least ten percent of the shares of stock in the corporation, subject to limitations.
Lower withholding tax rates would not apply to certain amounts, such as those subject to the
Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (“FIRPTA”), received from or paid by an inverted
company, and others.
Application of permanent establishment (“PE”) rules
The threshold of whether a qualified resident of Taiwan’s income from a U.S. trade or business
is subject to U.S. income tax would be raised to the PE standard in treaties, rather than the U.S.
trade or business standard applied in the IRC. If a qualified resident of Taiwan has a PE in the
United States, income which is subject to U.S. income tax would be only the qualified resident of
Taiwan’s taxable income effectively connected to the United States PE.
Treatment of income from employment
5
No U.S. tax would be imposed on certain wages of qualified residents of Taiwan in connection
with personal services performed in the U.S. Such wages cannot be paid by a U.S. person or
borne by a U.S. PE of a foreign person. This treatment does not apply to certain types of wages,
such as directors’ fees, pensions, and other wages that are generally taxable under the U.S.
Model Tax Treaty.
Determination of qualified residents of Taiwan, including rules for dual residents
A “qualified resident of Taiwan” generally is any person who is liable for tax to Taiwan because
of such person’s domicile, residence, place of management, place of incorporation, or any
similar criterion, and is not a U.S. person. Additional rules are provided to determine whether
certain dual resident individuals are treated as qualified residents of Taiwan. For corporations, a
qualified resident of Taiwan must also meet one of the limitation on benefits tests to be a
beneficiary of the provision.
Application and regulatory authority
The tax benefits provided to qualified residents of Taiwan only apply once the U.S. has
determined that Taiwan has granted reciprocal benefits to U.S. persons. Specific regulatory
authority is provided for a number of policies, and any regulations or other guidance should be
consistent with the provisions of the U.S. Model Tax Treaty.
Subtitle B United States-Taiwan Tax Agreement Authorization Act
Because the U.S. is unable to enter into a bilateral tax treaty with Taiwan due to Taiwan’s unique
status, subtitle B provides authorization to the President to negotiate and enter into a U.S.-
Taiwan tax agreement that includes provisions generally conforming with those customarily
contained in U.S. tax treaties.
Short Title. This section provides the short title for subtitle B (the “United States-Taiwan Tax
Agreement Authorization Act”).
Definitions. This section provides definitions for terms used in subtitle B, including the terms
“Agreement,” “appropriate congressional committees,” “approval legislation,” and
“implementing legislation.”
Authorization to Negotiate and Enter Into Agreement. This section states that the President
is authorized to negotiate and enter into a U.S.-Taiwan tax agreement only after the U.S. tax code
provisions described in subtitle A are enacted and effective. The tax agreement should include
only provisions customarily contained in U.S. tax treaties. In addition, the tax agreement may
incorporate and restate provisions of any agreement or existing law addressing double taxation
for residents of the U.S. and Taiwan. Finally, the tax agreement should include a statement of
authority and a provision conditioning the entry into force of the tax agreement upon (i)
enactment of approval and implementing legislation and (ii) confirmation by the Treasury
Secretary that Taiwan has approved and taken appropriate steps required to implement the tax
agreement.
6
Consultations with Congress. This section stipulates that the President provide written
notification to the appropriate congressional committees at least 15 days before commencement
of negotiations on a U.S.-Taiwan tax agreement. In addition, the section includes rules providing
that these committees be regularly briefed by the President on the status of negotiations and that
the Treasury Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of State, meet and consult with these
committees throughout the negotiations. Finally, the section provides rules regarding the
elements of those consultations.
Approval and Implementation of Agreement. This section states that a tax agreement does
not enter into force unless (i) the President, at least 60 days before the tax agreement is entered
into, publishes the text of the contemplated tax agreement on a publicly available website of the
Treasury Department, and (ii) approval and implementing legislation with respect to the tax
agreement is enacted into law. Further, this section provides that the President may provide for
the tax agreement to enter into force upon (i) enactment of approval and implementing
legislation, and (ii) confirmation by the Treasury Secretary that Taiwan has approved and taken
appropriate steps required to implement the tax agreement.
Submission to Congress of Agreement and Implementation Policy. This section stipulates
that not later than 270 days after the President enters into the tax agreement, (i) the President or
the President’s designee should submit to Congress the final text and a technical explanation of
the tax agreement, and (ii) the Treasury Secretary should submit to Congress a description of
changes to existing laws that the President considers would be necessary to ensure the U.S. acts
in a manner consistent with the tax agreement and a statement of anticipated administrative
action proposed to implement the tax agreement.
Consideration of Approval Legislation and Implementing Legislation. This section
provides language that should be included in approval legislation and indicates the congressional
committees to whom the approval and implementing legislation would be referred. Approval
legislation would be referred to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and House Ways &
Means Committee, and implementing legislation would be referred to the Senate Finance
Committee and House Ways & Means Committee.
Relationship of Agreement to Internal Revenue Code of 1986. This section states that no
provision of a tax agreement or approval legislation which is inconsistent with any provision of
the IRC shall have effect. Further, this section provides that nothing in subtitle B should be
construed to amend or modify any U.S. law or limit any authority conferred under any U.S. law
unless specifically provided for in subtitle B.
Authorization of Subsequent Tax Agreements Relative to Taiwan. This section modifies
the treatment of the terms “Agreement” and “tax agreement” so that, subsequent to the
enactment of approval and implementing legislation, the tax agreement authorization framework
provided in subtitle B may be utilized for a future U.S.-Taiwan tax agreement(s) that
supplements or supersedes a previous tax agreement(s). The section also provides that the
provisions of subtitle B, including the congressional consultation requirements in section 204,
should be applied separately with respect to each tax agreement.
7
United States Treatment of Double Taxation Matters With Respect to Taiwan. This
section provides congressional findings and a statement of policy regarding double taxation
matters with respect to Taiwan.
Part 4: Assistance for Disaster-Impacted Communities
Extension of Rules for Treatment of Certain Disaster-Related Personal Casualty Losses.
The Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2020 provided tax relief to certain
individuals in qualified disaster areas. The relief included special rules for qualified disaster-
related personal casualty losses, including eliminating the requirement that casualty losses must
exceed 10 percent of adjusted gross income (AGI) to qualify for the deduction, requiring losses
to exceed $500 per casualty in order to be deductible, and allowing taxpayers to claim the
casualty loss deduction “above the line,” i.e., without itemizing their deductions.
This section extends the rules for the treatment of certain disaster-related personal casualty losses
as passed in the Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2020, including any area with
respect to which a major disaster was declared by the President during the period beginning on
January 1, 2020, and ending 60 days after the date of enactment of the proposal if the incident
period of the disaster (as specified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as the period
during which the disaster occurred) begins on or after December 28, 2019, and on or before the
date of enactment of the proposal.
Exclusion From Gross Income for Compensation for Losses or Damages Resulting From
Certain Wildfires. In general, gross income is defined as income from whatever source
derived. This section excludes from gross income any amount received by or on behalf of an
individual as a qualified wildfire relief payment. It defines “qualified wildfire relief payment” as
any amount received by or on behalf of an individual for expenses, damages, or losses incurred
as a result of a qualified wildfire disaster, but only to the extent any expense, damage, or loss is
not compensated for by insurance or otherwise. This section also includes provisions to deny
double benefits.
This section applies only to qualified wildfire relief payments received by an individual during
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019, and before January 1, 2026.
East Palestine Disaster Relief Payments. In general, gross income is defined as income from
whatever source derived. This section treats East Palestine train derailment payments as qualified
disaster relief payments as defined in IRC section 139(b). Thus, these payments are excluded
from gross income and are subject to other present-law provisions applicable to qualified disaster
relief payments.
East Palestine train derailment payments are any amount received by or on behalf of an
individual as compensation for loss, damages, expenses, loss in real property value, closing costs
with respect to real property, or inconvenience resulting from the East Palestine train derailment
paid by a Federal, State, or local government agency, Norfolk Southern Railway, or any
subsidiary, insurer, or agent of Norfolk Southern Railway or any related person.
8
“East Palestine train derailment” is defined as the derailment of a train in East Palestine, Ohio,
on February 3, 2023. This section applies to amounts received on or after February 3, 2023.
Part 5: More Affordable Housing
State Housing Credit Ceiling Increase for Low-Income Housing Credit. In calendar years
2018 through 2021, the 9 percent LIHTC ceiling was increased by 12.5 percent, allowing states
to allocate more credits for affordable housing projects. This provision restores the 12.5 percent
increase for calendar years 2023 through 2025 and is effective for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2022.
Tax-Exempt Bond Financing Requirement. Under current law, to receive LIHTC a building
must either receive a credit allocation from the state housing finance authority or be bond-
financed. To be bond-financed, 50 percent or more of the aggregate basis of the building and
land must be financed with bonds that are subject to a state’s private activity bond volume cap.
This provision lowers the bond-financing threshold to 30 percent for projects financed by bonds
with an issue date before 2026. This section provides a transition rule for buildings that already
have bonds issued by requiring that a building must have 5 percent or more of its aggregate basis
financed by bonds with an issue date in 2024 or 2025.
This provision is effective for buildings placed in service after December 31, 2023. In the case of
rehabilitation expenditures, which are treated as a separate new building by the IRS, the building
is considered placed in service at the end of the rehabilitation expenditures period. The 30
percent requirement is applied to the aggregate basis of both the existing building and the
rehabilitation expenditures.
Part 6: Tax Administration and Eliminating Fraud
Increase in Threshold for Information Reporting on Forms 1099-NEC and 1099-MISC.
Under current law, the reporting threshold for payments by a business for services performed by
an independent contractor or subcontractor and for certain other payments is generally
$600. This section generally increases the threshold to $1,000 and adjusts it for inflation after
2024. Under current law, the reporting threshold is, in some cases, based on payments during the
taxable year. The new threshold is based on payments during the calendar year. This section
applies to payments made after December 31, 2023.
Enforcement Provisions with Respect to COVID-Related Employee Retention Tax Credit
(ERTC). Under current law, a $1,000 penalty may apply to a person who knows or has reason
to know that an understatement of the tax liability of another person would result from the use of
his aid, assistance, or advice. This section increases the penalty for aiding and abetting the
understatement of a tax liability by a COVID-ERTC promoter, separately defined, to the greater
of $200,000 ($10,000 in the case of a natural person) or 75 percent of the gross income of the
ERTC promoter derived (or to be derived) from providing aid, assistance, or advice with respect
to a return or claim for ERTC refund or a document relating to the return or claim.
9
Under current law, a paid tax return preparer may be subject to a $500 penalty for each failure to
comply with due diligence requirements relating to the filing status and amount of certain credits
with respect to a taxpayer’s return or claim for refund. This section requires a COVID-ERTC
promoter to comply with similar due diligence requirements with respect to a taxpayer’s
eligibility for (or the amount of) an ERTC and applies a $1,000 penalty for each failure to
comply. If the COVID-ERTC promoter does not comply with the due diligence requirements,
the promoter is also treated as knowing that his aid, assistance, or advice, would (if used) result
in an understatement of tax liability by another person, for purposes of imposing the penalty for
aiding and abetting the understatement of tax liability.
Under current law, certain material advisors are required to disclose information to the IRS with
respect to designated types of transactions (known as “listed transactions”) and to make lists of
advice recipients with respect to such transactions available to the IRS upon request. Under this
section, a COVID-ERTC promoter is similarly required to file return disclosures and provide
lists of clients to the IRS upon request.
This section defines a COVID-ERTC promoter as any person who provides aid, assistance, or
advice with respect to an affidavit, refund, claim, or other document relating to an ERTC, if the
person charges fees based on the amount of the credit or meets a gross-receipts test. The gross
receipts test is met if (1) aggregate gross receipts from ERTC-related aid, assistance, or advice
equal or exceed half of the person’s gross receipts for the relevant year, or (2) both (i) the
aggregate gross receipts for the relevant year from such advice exceeds 20 percent of the
person’s gross receipts for the relevant year and (ii) the person’s aggregate gross receipts from
all such advice exceeds $500,000 (after application of an aggregation rule). For this purpose,
certified professional employer organizations (PEOs) are not treated as COVID-ERTC
promoters.
Under current law, the statute of limitations period on assessment for the COVID-related ERTC
is generally five years from the date of the claim. This section extends the period to six years.
As a correlative matter, it extends the period for taxpayers to claim valid deductions for wages
attributable to invalid ERTC claims that are corrected after the normal period of limitations.
Under current law, taxpayers can claim COVID-related ERTC until April 15, 2025. This section
bars additional claims after January 31, 2024.
This section is effective for aid, assistance, or advice provided after March 12, 2020. The due
diligence requirement is effective for aid, assistance, or advice provided after the date of
enactment. The requirement for a COVID-ERTC promoter to file disclosures or maintain lists
with respect to aid, assistance, or advice provided before the date of enactment is effective 90
days after the date of enactment. The extension of the statute of limitations on assessment is
effective for assessments made after the date of enactment.