xIlkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online,2021; Vol 20 (Issue 2): pp.1196-1200
http://ilkogretim-online.org
doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.02.135
1196| Fahmida Manzoor
An Ecological study of Black Elk Speaks,Mad Bear and Rolling Thunder
An Ecological study of Black Elk Speaks,Mad Bear and Rolling
Thunder
Dr. Fahmida Manzoor, Lecturer,SBK Women University Quetta [email protected]
Dr. Shazia Ayyaz. Assistant Professor, University of Okara, Okara, Pakistan. drshaziaayyaz@gmail.com
Dr. Fouzia Rehman Khan, Assistant Professor, Department of English, Sardar Bahadur Khan Women's University,
Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan. [email protected]
Abstract - This study aims to explore the issues of ecology and environmental justice in American Indian
biographies.The paper examines the strong connection of American Indians with nature in three biographies Black
Elk Speaks, Mad Bear and Rolling Thunder. American Indians have a very strong connection with nature and they treat
nature as a living ‘Being’. The Biographies Mad Bear,Black Elk Speaks and Rolling Thunder highlight the issues of
displacement, loss of land, environmentalism.
Keywords: Eco-criticism,American Indianess,Identity crisis,Cultural Genocide.
I. INTRODUCTION
American Indian Literature highlights the issues of ecology and environmental justice in an elegiac and
sad tone. American Indians have a very strong connection with nature and they treat nature as a living
‘Being’. Nature for American Indians is a sacred being and they treat the natural objects as their relatives.
American Indian soul is solely synchronized with the sacred nature and they treat nature as a supreme
‘Being and it ‘possesses equal importance for them. American Indian literature moans the trauma of
terrific loss of eco-system. Native Americans respect nature and have religious ties to it which estranges
them from the euro-Americans. American Indians believe in the spiritual powers of nature and according
to them each and every object of nature is sacred and important and possesses sacred powers. Native
Americans have a great harmony with the objects of nature and value nature as highly sacred being.
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
Eco-criticism is the study of literature and its relation to physical environment. It addresses the issues
and relationship of human to nonhuman nature. Eco-criticism studies the criticism of environment
elucidated in literature. Eco criticism discusses the xenophobic, materialistic, scientific and imperial
behaviors which destroy the harmony of environment. The term Eco-criticism is coined by William
Rueckert in 1978 in his famous essay “Literature and Ecology: An experiment in Eco-criticism(Glotfelty,
1996, p.3). Eco-criticism refuses the stereotype notion of the world that nonhuman nature is inferior to
human nature. The main focus of Eco-criticism is to study nature through the lens of literature and in this
way discuss the literary edition of human and nonhuman nature. Eco-criticism is an interdisciplinary
branch of studies discusses the global crisis of environment and involves sociology, philosophy, history,
geography and psychology. Eco-criticism focuses on the issue of environment and sheds light on the
deteriorating effects of motorized and mechanical attitude toward nature.
Eco-criticism highlights the ethical and non-ethical behaviors toward nonhuman nature. It elucidates the
environmental problems and their solutions as Glotfelty(1999) talks about the environmental restoration
and says “if we are not a part of the solution, we are part of the problem”(qtd in
Oppermann,1999,p.30).Eco-criticism focuses on the earth-centered study in Literature and draws
attention to the devastating attitude of mechanical men toward nonhuman nature. It discusses the
environmental conscious issues in literary studies. Eco-critics want to discuss the environmental
problems and crisis in literary studies. Eco-criticism discusses the relation of culture and nature and
emphasizes the importance of both as both get effected by each other. Harold Fromm and Cheryll
Glotfelty are the pioneer critics in the studies of Eco-criticism. The Eco-criticism Reader: Landmarks In
Literary Ecology(1996)is a collection of Ecological essays collected by Glotfelty and Fromm which draw
attention to the importance of ecological approach to literature. Glotfelty and Fromm talk about the global
1197| Fahmida Manzoor
An Ecological study of Black Elk Speaks,Mad Bear and Rolling Thunder
environmental catastrophic situation and strive for its restoration. (Qtd in Glotfelty and Fromm, p.6).Glen
A.Love’s “Revaluing nature: Toward an Ecological Criticism” is another developmental step in Eco-
criticism theory. Love emphasizes the role of eco-consciousness instead of ego-consciousness. He
elucidates the significant role of nonhuman nature in human’s life and draws attention to the sacred side
of nature which is ignored by the mechanical man (Love,1996,p. 8).nonhuman nature is equally important
to the human nature according to eco-critics and they strive for it in their texts.
Modern man neglects the sacred part of nonhuman nature and subjugates nature. Dante Curtain
elucidates the issue of Environmental Racism’ and connects the suppression of man and nature and
says” The Connection, in Literary theory and practice, of race and the environment so that the oppression
of one is connected to, and supported by, the oppression of the other” (Curtain, 11).Nature is suppressed
by the cruel ways of man according to the critics of eco-criticism as Crosby calls it Ecological
Imperialism’.crosby illuminates the ways through which nature is subjugated and treated as ‘other’ in a
dominating society.(Qtd in Huggan and Tiffin,p.3).Eco-critics discuss the hegemonic centricism and
draws attention to the barbaric ways of the destruction of nonhuman nature. They stood against the
institutionalized murder of other’ nonhuman nature. The voice of the nature is silenced according to the
eco-critics and nature is turned into a silenced subject from a valuable being.(Manes, 1996, p.18) .Eco-
criticism illuminates the rights of nonhuman nature on human nature and believes in social justice with
environmental justice. The maxim of environmental justice‘was first raised by the ecological martyr
Ken Saro-Wiwa who was executed on November 1995.He stood against the pollution of water which
destroyed the water species.(Huggan and Tiffin, 2010, P.35).Eco-criticism illuminates the destruction of
Land and Environment and seeks for EnvironmentalSalvation’. Eco-Criticism discusses the issues of
nature and the natural objects are considered as the ecological-literary devices by the eco-critics.(Qtd in
Oppermann,p.38).
III. DISCUSSION OF DATA
American Indian Literature highlights the issues of ecology and environmental justice in an elegiac and
sad tone. American Indians have a very strong connection with nature and they treat nature as a living
‘Being’. Nature for American Indians is a sacred being and they treat the natural objects as their relatives.
American Indian soul is solely synchronized with the sacred nature and they treat nature as a supreme
‘Being ‘possess equal importance for them. American Indian literature moans the trauma of terrific loss of
eco-system. Native Americans respect nature and have religious ties to it which estranges them from the
euro-Americans. American Indians believe in the spiritual powers of nature and according to them each
and every object of nature is sacred and important and possesses sacred powers. Native Americans have a
great harmony with the objects of nature and value nature as highly sacred being.
American Indian biographies illuminate the issue of ecology in a very poignant tone and shed light on the
destruction of eco-system. Native Americans give equal importance to the non-human nature and rise
against the genocide of ecological life. American Indian culture has a great harmony with physical world
and environment which is illuminated in American Indian biographies. Eco-criticism as a theory has one
strand with ecology and the other with literature and the American Indian biographies represent this
connection of literature and environment in a beautiful way. The discourse of these biographies has a
pure synchronization with ecology and celebrates the rituals of environment in a very religious way.
American Indians struggle to maintain their traditional identity which is harmonious with nature. Native
Americans own nature as a relative of their own and strive hard for the environmental Salvation’ .The
land is considered very much sacred to Native Americans and have a reciprocal relation to nature.
Black Elk Speaks is a biography, a personal narrative of an American Indian holy man translated by John
G.Neihardt. It traces the pre-reservation to reservation life of the Sioux tribe. It poignantly traces the
cultural displacement and the loss of land of the Sioux tribe. Black Elk Speaks the historical genocide and
trauma of the loss of land at the hands of ‘Wasichuas’. Black elk Speaks shows an affinity with nonhuman
nature and a great respect for nonhuman life. Black Elk starts narration of his life to Neihardt and
elucidates the importance of nature in American Indian life as he says” It is the story of all life that is holy
and is good to tell, and of us two legged sharing it with the four-legged and the wings of the air and all
green things; for these are children of one mother and their father is one Spirit”(Neihhardt,1979,p. 1).The
life of American Indians revolve around the nature and nature is treated as a sublime being by them.
Native Americans believe in traditional ways of life and according to them nature is a relative to them
1198| Fahmida Manzoor
An Ecological study of Black Elk Speaks,Mad Bear and Rolling Thunder
possesses all rights which a human has in the society. The whole sphere of American Indian life is
harmonious to nature and the respect to nature reflects in each and every aspect of their life such as the
names of individuals are harmonious with nature. Names such as Black elk, Crazy Horse and Iron Hawk
show the American Indian’s affinity to the objects of nature. Themonths, years and places are also names
in the same very way such as the month of December is ‘Moon of the Popping trees’ and September is
‘Moon when the calves grow hair’. Blacks Elk Speaks illuminates the beliefs of American Indian about
nature as they believe in the spiritual powers of nature and regard nature as a sacred being. The natural
objects are used by the American Indians for cure for instance water and fire is an integral part of
American Indian ceremonies. Black Elk Speaks discuses different traditional ceremonies of Indian life
which show a complete harmony and affinity with nature for instance the Heyoka ceremony, War dances,
Horse dances and the Dog vision ceremony all revolve around the sublimity and elevation of sacred
Earth.Black Elk Speaks sheds light on the earthed centered ‘life of the American Indians which is very
much visible in each and every aspect of Indian life. The vision of Black Elk is all about the natural objects
which bring peace on the earth. The herbs, cup of water the spotted stick all show the desire of Black Elk
for peace on Indian land which is destroyed by the wasichuas.
Black Elk Speakselucidates the issue of Ecological Imperialism’ and sheds light on Indian’s strive for
their land and against Ecological Imperialism. The chapters of Fight with three stras’,’Wasichuas in the
hills’, and ‘The Butchering at Wounded Knee’ all show American Indian’s strife against Ecological
Imperialism. In his Invocation song Black Elk addresses the all Objects of nature and seeks help from
them for peace and power. Black Elk addresses different objects of nature and says “Hearme, Four
Quarters of the world-a relative I am!give me the strength to walk the soft earth, a relative to all that
is…(Neihardt,4).The world of Indians is very much traditional and Black Elk speaks shows how Indians
crave to maintain kinship with nature. The American Indians strive against the Ecological racism by the
wasichuas who according to the American Indians destroyed Indian harmony with land and nature as
Black Elk says “The wasichuas came, and they have made little islands for the us and other little islands
for the four-legged… wasichua; and it is dirty with lies and greed”(Neihardt, 1979, p. 8). The American
Indians stood against the cultural genocide and the loss of land. Black Elk narrates the history of the cruel
murders of Native Americans by wasichuas in his chapter ’Butchering at Wounded knee’ and mourns the
loss of people and land. The land which is considered very much sacred by the Indians was snatched by
the wasichuas and exploited. The battles traced in Black Elk speaks are the instances of the Indian strife
for the ‘Environmental salvation.Nature is treated as a sacred and sublime being by the Indian
Americans but the Wasichuas silenced the voice of nature by destroying the harmony of nature and Earth
Mother. The Native Americans pay respect to nature to a very great extent and mourn the loss of land and
destruction of the eco-system. Black Elk Speaks elucidates the different objects of nature which are very
much sacred to the Native Americans such as the sacred herb which was gifted to Black Elk by one of the
fathers in his vision and had a great significance in Black Elk’s life.Black Elk speaks illuminates the
American Indian’s respect for nature and animals. The horses and bison are very much sacred for the
Sioux tribe and horse become very much sacred for Black elk in his vision .The American Indians perform
rituals like ‘Horse dance’ and value animals as their relatives. Black Elk connects himself to eagle feels
affiliation and kinship for it. Thewhole sphere of Black Elk Speaks spins around the Ecological loss of
American Indians and mourns for the ‘environmental salvation’.
Native Americans regard nature as ‘Supreme Being’ possesses great powers which control their lives.
Rolling Thundercommemorates the sacred and spiritual powers of nature and grieves the loss of land and
demolition of eco-system.Rolling Thunder is a biography of a medicine man narrated by Dough Boyd.The
American Indians approach to life is ‘earth-centered’ and they value each and every object of and believe
in the spiritual powers of the objects of nature such as Rolling Thunder calls the ‘herbs’ his helpers to cure
humanity and says that he feels the feelings of the herbs and says “Often Herbs just appear when they are
needed”(Boyd,1974,p.9).Rolling Thunder venerates plants ,feels association and connection with them
and pays respects to the plants.American Indians pay respect to all objects of nature such as Rolling
Thunder put coins at the head of the plants to pay them respect and show his regard for the plants. The
American Indians have a different kind of affinity with nature which alienates them from the Euro-
Americans. Nature and Man according to American Indians are one and part of one being. They believe in
the spiritual powers of nature and take what is needed and make apologies to the animals when they
need to slaughter them and then they use the whole of it only for good purposes. Natural objects have
mystical powers according to Rolling Thunder and he says even a simple water can cure you if you pray
over it. (Boyd,1974,p.9).Rolling Thunder calls nature an ‘Organism’ a living Being and can hear the
melodious voice of nature which according to famous Eco-critic Glotfelty is ‘Silenced’(Glotfelty,8) by the
1199| Fahmida Manzoor
An Ecological study of Black Elk Speaks,Mad Bear and Rolling Thunder
destruction and demolition.American Indians could hear the voice of nature in each and every object of
nature such as Alice Floto in Rolling Thundercommunicates to the bees and dogs. Rolling Thunder strives
against the “ecological racism” and the way nature is marginalized and make ‘other’ by the Euro-
Americans. Rolling Thunder elucidates the sublime position of nature in American Indian life and says;
”Great Spirit is the Life that is in all things-all the creatures and the plants and even the rocks and the
minerals .All things …have their own will and their own way and their own purpose; this is what is to be
respected”(Boyd,1974, p. 52).
Rolling Thunder celebrates the sublime issue of nature on one hand and mourns the genocide of the
natural environment on the other hand. He craves for the ‘Environmental salvation’ and illuminates the
incidents which disturbed the harmony of American Indians and nature. Rolling Thunder sheds light on
the treaty of 1863 which was made in Navada between U.S government and the Shoshone tribe. The
treaty which was paid in blood according to Rolling Thunder disturbed and destroyed the harmony of
nature and Shoshone tribe. American Indians take what they really need and they take it with reverence
and never waste anything.Rolling Thunder discusses the Indian ways and draws a comparison between
white ways and calls whites ‘trophy hunters’ who hunt just for the sake of their name and prize and never
care and thin that what they kill. He calls them destructive, greedy and inconsiderate while the Indian
way is very much considerate and cordial. Human and nonhuman nature has a melodious harmony in
American Indian life which is highlighted in Rolling Thunder as Rolling Thunder communicates to
different objects of nature for instance to the clouds and snakes. It rains when he communicates to the
clouds and the snake leaves when Rolling Thunder communicates to it. Rolling Thunder draws attention
to the voice of nonhuman nature and says that nature doesn’t understand the language but get the
meanings. Rolling Thunder highlights the issue of ‘spiritual’ spirit of nature and draws a comparison
between Indian ways and the scientific ways of medicine. A physical pain and infection according to the
American Indians is a sign of spiritual impurity and to cure such a disease needs much more than the
physical body. American Indians believe mainly in man not the sickness and they cure the man while
Euro-Americans look at the sickness not the man.
Eco-criticism raises voice against the devastating effects of modernizations and Industrialization on
nature. Rolling Thunder poignantly discusses the same issue and says “They’ve taken everything,…, Killed
every bit of life here, trees, Indian tea, sacred herbs, everything”(Boyd ,1974,p. 173).Rolling Thunder
elucidates the ways Indians lands were exploited by the Euro-Americans. The broken treaty of Shoshone
and the issue of ‘Eli’ chains and pinion tress is an environmental genocide by the Euro-Americans. The
progress of civilization damaged the face of earth according to Rolling Thunder and mourns the death of
each Piniontree. The American Indians are declared the custodians of land’by Rolling Thunder and he
treats nature as a sublime Being’. The nature is marginalized by the Euro-Americans and the American
Indians strive to restore its real state and place as Rolling Thunder says that the Indians want to live in
harmony with nature. Glen A.Love, a very famous Eco-Critic in his essay Revaluing Nature; Toward an
Ecological Criticism” (qtd in Joni Admson,2001,p.23) talks about the diversion to ‘Eco-consciousness’
from ‘ego-consciousness’.Rolling Thunder highlight the environmental genocide and sayswe are still
losing our lands…and they are still killing our people. (Boyd,1974,p.78). Rolling Thunder bewails the loss
of land, cultural heritage and beliefs.
American Indians customs and culture believe in ‘Unity’ with nature. Mad Bear illuminates the ‘unity’ of
American Indians with nature. American Indians live in complete harmony with nature and possess
strong bond and connection to each and every object of nature.Mad Bear illuminates the significant role of
‘Earth’ in American Indian life. Earth is considered very much important and sacred in Native American
life and they call it ‘Earth Mother’ .Mad Bear sheds light on the deterioration of Earth Mother’ by the
Euro-American interlopers.American Indians were subjugated by the Euro-Americans and in the same
very way nature was silenced by the Euro-Americans. Mad Bear mourns the loss of land and the
destruction of Earth Mother in a very harsh tone. Indian Americans venerate nature as a spiritual being
and Mad Bear bereaves the issue of deforesting and calls it a ‘rape’ of Earth Mother by the Euro-
Americans .Eco-criticism focuses the issue of despoliation of nature and rebel against it through their
written work.Cheryll and Glotfelty elaborated the point of physical world and human culture and say they
are very much interlinked and connected.(Glotfelty,1996,p.18).Mad Bear elucidates the same aspect of
human and nonhuman nature. Human culture has a great link to the nonhuman nature. The traditional
ceremonies of American Indians all spin around the natural objects and American Indian believe in the
mystic powers of nature as Mad Bear says” In our religious services we pray for all people, no matter
what colour, skin–and for the animals, and all things around us in Mother Earth”(Boyd.78).American
1200| Fahmida Manzoor
An Ecological study of Black Elk Speaks,Mad Bear and Rolling Thunder
Indians strongly believe in the spirit of Nature and traditional ways which relate to nature. Mad Bear
predicts upcoming events which shows his great harmony with nature. American Indians listen to the
voice of nature which was silenced by the devastation of Euro-Americans. The American Indians don’t
believe in the mechanic modern life and stay in harmony with nature. Nature for them is sacred and they
believe in ‘collectiveness’ and ‘unity’ as mad bear say”Cooperate,cultivate and live, Compete,Combat and
die”(Boyd,1994,p.8).Competition is near to death for the Native American life and Mad Bear illuminates
this issue in a very ironical tone. Mad Bear doesn’t believe in the dictum of ‘survival of the fittestwhich
brings American Indians in conflict with the main stream of America. Euro-Americans strongly believe in
competition and mechanic ways of life which according to Native Americans is death. American Indians
pay respect to Earth Mother and for the Euro-American, the connotation of Earth is different. The Notion
of earth for Euro-American is derogatory as according to them anything which belongs to nature is dirty,
earthy and inferior. Mad Bear illuminates the role of nature in American Indian life and discusses the
Indian way of life which pays great reverence to nature as Mad bear says” Simple thing, giving thanks to
Mother Earth-every time you eat, every time you walk on the grass”(Boyd,1994,p.61).The American
Indians stood against the ‘ecological imperialism’ as Mad Bear bereaves the issue of juniper and Pinon
tress which were cleaved by caterpillar tractors. The deforesting this way destroyed the whole ecological
life, plants, animals and Mad Bear calls it a funeral of relatives. Mad bear narrates the story of false face
for Dough Boyd which is a symbolic story and reflects the white ways of deterioration of nature.
IV. CONCLUSION
Eco-criticism discusses the materialistic, scientific and imperial behaviors which destroy the harmony of
environment. American Indian Literature highlights the issues of ecology and environmental justice in an
elegiac and sad tone. American Indians have a very strong connection with nature and they treat nature
as a living ‘Being’. The Biographies Mad Bear,Black Elk Speaks and Rolling Thunder highlight the issues of
displacement, loss of land, and environmentalism.
REFERENCES
1. Admson,Joni.(2001).American Indian Literature, Enviornamental Justice snd Ecocriticism.
Tuscon: University of Arizona.
2. Boyd, Dough.(1974).Rolling Thunder. New York: Random House.
3. Boyd, Dough.(1994) Mad Bear. New York: Simon&Schuster.
4. Glotfelty, Cheryll &Fromm,Harold.(1996).The Eco-criticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary
Ecology University of Georgia Press.
5. Huggan,Graham &Tiffin,Helen.(2010). Postcolonial Eco-criticism” London: Routledge.
6. Love,Glen.(1996).Revaluing Nature:Toward an Ecological Criticism in Glotfelty,Cheryll.&
Fromm, Harold. “The Eco-criticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology”: University of
Georgia.
7. Manes,Christopher. in Glotfelty,Cheryll & Fromm,Harold. The Eco-criticism Reader: Landmarks in
Literary Ecology”: University of Georgia Press, 1996.
8. Neihardt,John. (1979).Black Elk Speaks. London:University of Nebraska Press.
9. Oppermann, Serpil.(1999). Eco-criticism:natural World In the Literary Viewfinder” Journal of
faculty of Lettters.16.2(1999):29-46.